![]() ![]() If Hissrich remains true to Time of Content's plot, the story is about to get even more dark and violent than in previous seasons. It wouldn't be The Witcher if there was a happy ending, would it? Unfortunately, another dangerous plot is afoot upon their arrival, with political corruption, betrayals and death everywhere. And yes, we'll talk about Eskel."Īnd just like on Reddit, fans on Twitter are also throwing criticism at Netflix regarding adaptations.The official The Witcher Twitter account (opens in new tab) revealed that once again, Geralt will be shuttling Ciri off for her protection and Yen thinks Aretuza is just the place. Showrunner Lauren Schmidt Hissrich, who often interacts with fans on Twitter (opens in new tab), said that she's open to talking about Eskel: "Sending love and also excitement for future Reddit debates with everyone watching (opens in new tab)! I've never been one to shy away from digging in, so love it or hate it, keep those passionate opinions coming. I hope Cavill is trying to urge them in a better direction since he's such a big fan of the books and games." ![]() "I really, really wanted this show to be good but it's just not. Now the show just has better production values. Since season 1, "ridiculous changes" to characters, lore and story arcs had been made. User Jagick (opens in new tab) said in another thread that they're not surprised with what the writers put together. Henry Cavill can do a lot but he can’t make the writers anything other than sci-fi hacks." "The sad simple fact is it’s a poorly written show, said user AlwaysKindaLost (opens in new tab). Why, you wonder, would they get Eskel wrong and the, in a flashback, get him right?Ĭavill, who fans have fallen back on as a savior for the show, feel that he only has so much power over the final production. #THE WITCHER 2 SERIAL NUMBER LOCATION HOW TO#TheHarkinator (opens in new tab) also made a good point, stating "It’s like they killed him off and then demonstrated they knew how to get it right all along. They could've called him anything, except for eskell. In another Reddit thread, user Deep-Doughnut-9423 (opens in new tab) said, "I completely agree, it made no sense at all. I loved his contrast in books against other Witchers in Kaer Morhen." I was really disappointed not seeing real Eskel there. ![]() User Franiu_ (opens in new tab) also believes that there was no great reason to kill off Eskel, writing "They could just take any of their made up Witchers and replace Eskel in story with leshen. User prazulsaltaret (opens in new tab) believes the writers did so for shock value, which are "the markings of a poor writer." There have been multiple threads on Reddit trying to answer this question. Not only that, why choose Eskel for this story, and not the numerous other nameless Witchers that were mulling about Kaer Morhen? It's led to a lot of fans asking what the writers were thinking, and if they do care about being true to Andrzej Sapkowski's original vision. His passing is also a shock because Eskel plays a critical role in future events in the books and games. In a moment of desperation, Geralt is forced to kill Eskel before he could do more damage.Īnd just like that, a critical character in the Witcher lore is killed off, given no character development and sent to the grave far from the man fans knew. Unfortunately, he's been infected by a Leshen, a tree-like monster, which kills her and begins wreaking havoc. After almost getting into a fight with Geralt, he runs off with one of the women. In episode 2, things go bad when Eskel makes the foolish and careless decision to invite a brothel up to Kaer Morhen to party with the Witchers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |